Right of election

in burgage holders

Background Information

Number of voters: about 130

Constituency business
County
Date Candidate Votes
24 Jan. 1715 JOHN EYLES
GILES EARLE
John Bayntun
John Norris
20 Apr. 1720 EARLE re-elected after appointment to office
22 Mar. 1722 EDWARD ROLT
SIR JOHN EYLES
22 Jan. 1723 THOMAS BOUCHER vice Rolt, deceased
95
John Pitt
25
Alexander Elton
0
18 Aug. 1727 ROGERS HOLLAND
GABRIEL ROBERTS
24 Apr. 1734 RICHARD LONG
73
ROGERS HOLLAND
68
Sir John Eyles
57
Francis Eyles
49
22 June 1737 EDWARD BAYNTUN ROLT vice Holland, appointed to office
91
Rogers Holland
32
4 May 1741 EDWARD BAYNTUN ROLT
71
SIR EDMUND THOMAS
69
Alexander Hume
60
John Frederick
50
26 June 1747 SIR EDMUND THOMAS
EDWARD BAYNTUN ROLT
24 June 1751 BAYNTUN ROLT re-elected after appointment to office
Main Article

At the accession of George I Chippenham was an open borough, with the Whig and Tory interests fairly evenly balanced. In 1715 and 1727 ministerial supporters were returned, but in 1722 and 1734 the Government secured only one seat, which was lost at a by-election in 1737 to an opposition Whig, Edward Bayntun Rolt, of Spye Park, four miles from the town, an estate carrying with it the most important interest in the borough.

At the next general election great efforts were made by the Government to recover both seats. But in October 1740 Bayntun Rolt and Sir Edmund Thomas, the other opposition candidate, with several of their supporters, were made freemen,1Chippenham Recs. ed. Goldney, 81. thus acquiring control of the corporation and with it the nomination of the bailiff, who acted as returning officer. Two days before the election they are alleged to have brought into the town ‘a considerable number of armed men ... to terrify and intimidate the voters’. Their final blow was to arrange for the arrest on a trumped up charge of their opponents’ chief supporter, the sheriff, who was detained at Devizes, bail of £10,000 being refused, till the morning after the poll.2CJ, xxiv. 15-16. After an expensive and disorderly contest, on which one of the government candidates spent some £4,000,3Add. 32995, f. 172. Bayntun Rolt and Thomas were narrowly elected. The resulting petition was dealt with on purely party lines by the House of Commons, who on 28 Jan. 1742 decided a minor point in connexion with it against the Government by one vote, the immediate cause of Walpole’s resignation. On 2 Feb. the final determination of the petition was carried against the Administration by 16 votes. No future election at Chippenham was contested till 1802.

Author
Notes
  • 1. Chippenham Recs. ed. Goldney, 81.
  • 2. CJ, xxiv. 15-16.
  • 3. Add. 32995, f. 172.